NTISthis.com

Evidence Guide: LGAPLEM510A - Plan for the safe movement of cyclists

Student: __________________________________________________

Signature: _________________________________________________

Tips for gathering evidence to demonstrate your skills

The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!

From the Wiki University

 

LGAPLEM510A - Plan for the safe movement of cyclists

What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?

Identify existing or potential cyclist movements

  1. New and planned developments are designed to provide for future cyclist movements.
  2. Complaints, requests, comments, and observations are analysed to identify problems, risks and concerns.
  3. Records and statistics are analysed to identify cyclist trends.
  4. Research is undertaken to collect evidence on the movement of cyclists and other traffic flow.
New and planned developments are designed to provide for future cyclist movements.

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Complaints, requests, comments, and observations are analysed to identify problems, risks and concerns.

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Records and statistics are analysed to identify cyclist trends.

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Research is undertaken to collect evidence on the movement of cyclists and other traffic flow.

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Identify current ability of infrastructure to facilitate safe cyclist movement

  1. Current infrastructure is investigated to clearly establish conditions that affect the safe movement of cyclists.
  2. Identified problems and concerns are compared and assessed against legislative requirements, Australian standards, codes of practice and community expectations.
  3. Clear priorities based on a ranking of safety factors are established.
Current infrastructure is investigated to clearly establish conditions that affect the safe movement of cyclists.

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Identified problems and concerns are compared and assessed against legislative requirements, Australian standards, codes of practice and community expectations.

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Clear priorities based on a ranking of safety factors are established.

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Evaluate the options for the safe movement of cyclists

  1. Options for assisting the safe movement of cyclists are identified.
  2. All options are assessed on the basis of cost effectiveness, efficiency, equity and practicality.
  3. Preferred options to rectify problems and concerns are selected based on agreed criteria.
Options for assisting the safe movement of cyclists are identified.

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All options are assessed on the basis of cost effectiveness, efficiency, equity and practicality.

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred options to rectify problems and concerns are selected based on agreed criteria.

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prepare preliminary report

  1. A submission to council is made in accordance with requirements.
  2. Opportunities are provided for community consultation to maximise acceptance of preferred options.
  3. Statutory and other relevant authority approvals are obtained in required time frames with minimal modifications to the preferred option.
  4. Clear, concise documentation is prepared that provides full preliminary cost details.
A submission to council is made in accordance with requirements.

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Opportunities are provided for community consultation to maximise acceptance of preferred options.

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Statutory and other relevant authority approvals are obtained in required time frames with minimal modifications to the preferred option.

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Clear, concise documentation is prepared that provides full preliminary cost details.

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prepare detailed design

  1. A submission to council is made in accordance with requirements.
  2. Opportunities are provided for community consultation to maximise acceptance of preferred options.
  3. Statutory and other relevant authority approvals are obtained in required time frames with minimal modifications to the preferred option.
  4. Clear, concise documentation is prepared that provides full preliminary cost details.
A submission to council is made in accordance with requirements.

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Opportunities are provided for community consultation to maximise acceptance of preferred options.

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Statutory and other relevant authority approvals are obtained in required time frames with minimal modifications to the preferred option.

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Clear, concise documentation is prepared that provides full preliminary cost details.

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Monitor the effectiveness of the design

  1. Records and statistics are monitored to measure the effectiveness of the program.
  2. Complaints, requests and comments are reviewed to identify ongoing acceptance of the program.
  3. Agreed time frame and criteria are considered.
Records and statistics are monitored to measure the effectiveness of the program.

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Complaints, requests and comments are reviewed to identify ongoing acceptance of the program.

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Agreed time frame and criteria are considered.

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assessed

Teacher: ___________________________________ Date: _________

Signature: ________________________________________________

Comments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Instructions to Assessors

Evidence Guide

Overview of assessment requirements

A person who demonstrates competency in this unit will be able to perform the outcomes described in the Elements to the required performance level detailed in the Performance Criteria. The knowledge and skill requirements described in the Range Statement must also be demonstrated. For example, knowledge of the legislative framework and safe work practices that underpin the performance of the unit are also required to be demonstrated.

Critical aspects of evidence to be considered

Development of bicycle strategic plan.

Analysis of information.

Production of accurate information.

Analysis of sites and information.

Interpretation of data.

Presentation of options.

Effective problem solving based on research.

Context of assessment

On the job or in a simulated work environment.

Relationship to other units(prerequisite or co-requisite units)

Prerequisite units: nil.

Co-requisite units: nil.

Method of assessment

The following assessment methods are suggested:

observation of the learner performing a range of workplace tasks over sufficient time to demonstrate handling of a range of contingencies

written and/or oral questioning to assess knowledge and understanding

completion of workplace documentation

third-party reports from experienced practitioners

completion of self-paced learning materials including personal reflection and feedback from trainer, coach or supervisor.

Evidence required for demonstration of consistent performance

Evidence will need to be gathered over time across a range of variables.

Resource implications

Access to a workplace or simulated case study that provides the following resources:

state and national cycling policies and bicycle plans

relevant computer database

traffic reports and surveys

consultation process with relevant stakeholders.

Required Skills and Knowledge

This describes the essential skills and knowledge and their level, required for this unit

Required Skills

consultation and negotiation

qualitative and quantitative research

interpreting policy

written and verbal reporting

applying legislation

applying standards and guidelines

forecasting cyclists and other traffic trends

estimating resources

procurement practices

cost control

designing information, brochures, etc.

analysing and interpreting data

conducting workshops.

Required Knowledge

associated legislation

standards and guidelines

council policy

council structure and services

state bicycle plans

planning cycles

state and national cycling policies

development principles.

Hidden text

Range Statement

The Range Statement relates to the Unit of Competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording in the Performance Criteria is detailed below.

Types of cycling environments may include:

Types of cycling environments may include:

Options for development may include:

education and awareness programs

bicycle strategy plan

bike paths and lanes.

Consultation may include:

police

health authorities

bicycle clubs and associations

road and transport authorities

other traffic groups.

Statistics may include:

police reports

bicycle agencies

traffic management plan.

Hidden text